Skip to content

🛡️ Security Testing with OWASP ZAP

Security is most effective when it becomes part of the engineering process, not an afterthought. My approach combines functional testing with vulnerability assessment to help identify security risks before production deployment.


Overview

In addition to functional and automation testing, I perform baseline security assessments using OWASP ZAP to identify common web application vulnerabilities.

My goal is to identify common security weaknesses early in the software delivery lifecycle, enabling engineering teams to remediate issues before production. While this does not replace a dedicated penetration test, it complements functional testing by integrating baseline application security checks into the QA process.


Security Validation Coverage

Typical assessments include:

  • Passive Scanning
  • Active Scanning
  • Authentication Testing
  • Session Management
  • Cookie Security
  • HTTP Header Validation
  • SSL/TLS Verification
  • Input Validation
  • Injection Testing
  • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
  • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
  • Security Misconfiguration
  • Information Disclosure

Tools

Tool Purpose
OWASP ZAP Security Assessment
Browser Proxy Request Interception
Swagger/OpenAPI Endpoint Discovery
Postman API Validation
SQL Backend Verification

Typical Workflow

Target Application
Spider / Crawl
Passive Scan
Active Scan
Vulnerability Analysis
Risk Classification
Security Report
Developer Remediation

Vulnerabilities Assessed

Input Validation

  • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
  • SQL Injection
  • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Authentication & Session Security

  • Authentication Weaknesses
  • Session Management
  • Cookie Security

Configuration & Infrastructure

  • Missing Security Headers
  • Insecure HTTP Methods
  • Mixed Content
  • Information Disclosure
  • Directory Browsing

Risk Classification

  • High
  • Medium
  • Low
  • Informational

Deliverables

Typical deliverables include:

  • HTML Security Assessment Reports
  • Vulnerability Summaries
  • Risk Classification
  • Evidence Screenshots
  • Remediation Recommendations
  • Security Validation Results

Business Impact

Integrating baseline security testing into the QA process helped teams:

  • Identify common vulnerabilities earlier in the development lifecycle
  • Improve release confidence through security validation
  • Reduce the risk of deploying known security issues
  • Support secure development practices
  • Provide developers with actionable remediation guidance
  • Encourage security awareness across engineering teams

Screenshots

📸 Automated Spider Mapping

OWASP ZAP Spider

This assessment demonstrates how OWASP ZAP automatically maps an application's attack surface by discovering pages, technologies, and API endpoints before active security testing begins.

Read the full LinkedIn article

📸 Vulnerability Assessment

OWASP ZAP Alerts

This scan highlights how vulnerabilities are prioritized using OWASP ZAP's Alerts dashboard, helping teams focus on the most critical security issues first.

Read the full LinkedIn article

📄 Sample Security Assessment Report

The report below demonstrates the type of HTML vulnerability assessment generated after an automated OWASP ZAP scan. It summarizes discovered issues, their severity, affected endpoints, and recommended remediation steps.

{ loading=lazy }

Sensitive project information has been removed for confidentiality.

Sample Security Assessment HTML Report


Skills Demonstrated

  • OWASP Top 10
  • Vulnerability Assessment
  • Web Security Testing
  • Risk Analysis
  • Security Reporting
  • Secure SDLC

Lessons Learned

Security testing reinforced that software quality extends beyond functionality. By incorporating baseline security validation into regular QA activities, teams can detect common vulnerabilities earlier, reduce remediation costs, and build more secure applications without disrupting development workflows.